Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones.

نویسندگان

  • J P Neoptolemos
  • D L Carr-Locke
  • D P Fossard
چکیده

One hundred and twenty patients with known common bile duct stones were entered into a prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone clearance (group 1) versus surgery alone (group 2). Five patients were incorrectly entered; the 55 patients randomised to group 1 and the 60 randomised to group 2 were well matched with respect to clinical features and biochemical and medical risk factors. In group 1 endoscopic stone clearance was successful in 50 patients (91%); five of these patients refused elective surgery, though this was subsequently necessary in one. In group 2 common bile duct stones were cleared surgically in 54 of 59 patients (91.5%); one patient was treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy alone because of a myocardial infarct. The overall major complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and included two deaths; in group 2 this was 8.5% and included one death. The minor complication rate in group 1 was 16.4% and that in group 2 13.6%. These differences in outcome were not significant. Despite a significant reduction in total hospital stay of patients in group 1, these results do not support the routine use of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients having biliary surgery for stones in the common bile duct.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Before Cholecystectomy?

J.P. Neoptolemos, D.L. Carr-Locke and D.P. Fossard. (1987) Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. British Medical Journal, 294,470-474. One hundred and twenty patients with known common bile duct stones were entered into a prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone clearance (...

متن کامل

Does Metoclopramide Reduce Variceal Pressure?

out, should give a better evaluation of its diagnostic and therapeutic value in patients who are to undergo biliary surgery. (1987) Prospective randomised study of pre-operastive endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones. (1987) Study of common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in a consecutive series of 438 patients. (1988) Surgical versus end...

متن کامل

Common Bile Duct Stones ERCP or Surgery?

Stain, S. C., Cohen, H., Tsuishoysha, M., Donovan, A.J. (1991) Choledocholithiasis Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Annals of Surgery; 213:627-634 A prospective randomized trial was conducted of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgery (ES&S) or surgery alone (SA) in 52 patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis that were candidates for electiv...

متن کامل

The Role of Sphincterotomy in The Management of Common Bile Duct Stones

Neoptolemos JP, Shqw DE, Cart-Locke DL (1989) A Multivariate Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors in Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones Implications for Treatment. Annals of Surgery 209: 157-161. A multivariate analysis of 30 preoperative risk factors was undertaken in 248 patients who underwent surgery alone for common bile duct (CBD) stones and in 190 patients who had endoscopic sphincter...

متن کامل

Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial.

BACKGROUND Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) of the sphincter of Oddi has been proposed as an alternative therapy with possible advantages, as compared with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), for removal of bile duct stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a randomised study, we compared the efficacy and complication rate of the two techniques in 202 patients with common bile duct stones. Patients wer...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • British medical journal

دوره 294 6570  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1987